The effectiveness of the Dual Inquiry Cycle Model (CICM) in teaching science on developing future thinking and cognitive beliefs among sixth-grade primary school students

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor of Curriculum and Science Teaching Methods at King Abdullah Air Defense College.

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of the Dual Inquiry Cycle Model (CICM) in teaching science on developing future thinking skills and cognitive beliefs among sixth-grade primary school students. In order to achieve the study objective, the experimental method was used, The study sample consisted of (56) sixth grade primary school students, who were distributed equally into the two study groups, so that the experimental group consisted of (28) students, and the control group also consisted of (28) students. After that, the study tools specified in the future thinking test and the cognitive beliefs scale were applied to the two study groups, and in light of that, the necessary data were collected and analyzed statistically. The results came as follows:
1-    There is a statistically significant difference at the level of (0.05) between the average scores of students in the control and experimental groups in the post-application of the future thinking test and the cognitive beliefs scale in favor of the experimental group.
2-    There is a statistically significant correlation between the total score of the future thinking test and the total score of the cognitive beliefs scale in the post-application for students in the experimental group.
Based on the results of the study, a set of necessary recommendations and proposals were included.

Keywords


Alister Jones & Kathy Saunders (2012): Developing Students’ Futures Thinking in Science Education, Res. Sci. Educ. 42, pp 687-708.
Bakar, Z., & Ali, R. (2018). Epistemological beliefs in classroom learning among secondary school students in Pakistan. Advanced Science Letters; 24 (5), 3507- 3511.
Braten, I., Olaussen, B. (2005). Profiling individual differences in student motivation: A longitudinal cluster-analytic study in different academic contexts. Contemporary educational psychology, 30(3),359-396.
Dunkhase, J. (2003). The coupled- inquiry cycle: A teacher concerns- based model for effective student inquiry. Science Educator, 12, 10- 15.
Hofer, B. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implication for learning and teaching. Educational psychology review, 13 (4), 353-383.
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P.R.(1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning Review of Educational Research , 97, 88-140.
Jones, A., & Buntting, C., & Hipkins, R., McKim, A., Conner, L., & Saunders, K. (2012). Developing student's futures thinking in Science Education. Research in science Education, 42, 687-708.
Maxwell, D.; Lambeth, D. and Cox, J. (2015). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on science achievement for fifth-grade students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16 (1), 1-31.
Pintrich, p. & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self- regulation: the role of cognitive and motivational factors, Development of achievement motivation. (pp.249-284).
Rooney, C. (2012). How am i using inquiry – based learning to improve my practice and to encourage higher order – thinking a among my students of mathematics.  Educational journal of living theories, 5, (2),99-127.
Schommer – Aikins, M., Mau, W. C., Brokhat, S., (2000). beliefs about Knowledge an learning using a multidimensional paradigm. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 2, 120-127.
Schommer , M. (1990). Effects of belefs about the nature of knowledge of Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498-504.
Schommer- Aikins, M., & Easter, M. (2006). Ways of knowing and epistemological belief: comind effect on academic performance . Educational psychology, (26) 3, 411-423.
Schommer-Aikins, M. 2004. explaining the Epistemological Belief System: Introducing the Embedded Systemic Model and Coordinated Research Approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19-29.
Schraw, G., Bendixen , L . D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the epistemic belief inventory (EBI). In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds) Personal epistemology: the psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 261-275). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Tang, J. (2010). Exploratory confirmatory Factor analysis of epistemic beliefs questionnaire about mathematics for Chinese Junior middle school students. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3, 2, 89-105.