The Relationship Between The Development Of Concepts And The Morphological Formulation Skills In The Light Of Teaching A Proposed Strategy List Of Cognitive Load Among Al-Azhar Preparatory Stage Students.

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

قسم المناهج وطرق التدريس، كلية التربية بالدقهلية، جامعة الأزهر

Abstract

The current study aimed at revealing the relationship between the development of concepts and Morphological Formulation Skills in the light of teaching with a proposed strategy based on the of cognitive load among Al-Azhar preparatory stage students. The pre and post, and the research group consisted of (60) students divided into two groups, control and experimental, for each group (30) students, who were chosen from the students of the second grade of middle school Al-Azhar, and the research included tow research tools: a test to morphological concepts, and a test of morphological drafting skills, and their validity and stability were confirmed, and the tools were applied beforehand, and then the morphological topics prescribed for were taught for the two groups in the first semester of the year 2022/2023 AD. The researcher used a proposed strategy based on the theory of cognitive load in teaching The exchange subjects decided for the experimental group, while the control group was taught in the usual way, then the tools were applied post-application, and the results showed that there were statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the experimental group students in the post-application in favor of the experimental group; And the existence of a positive correlation between the development of morphological concepts and morphological drafting skills, and the study concluded with a number of recommendations and proposals in the light of the results of the study.

Keywords

References

Antonenko, P. (2007). The effect of leads on cognitive load and learning in a conceptually rich hypertext environment (Doctoral Dissertation, Iowa State University).‏ Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/
Beckmann, J. (2010). Taming a beast of burden–On some issues with the conceptualisation and operationalisation of cognitive load. Learning and instruction, 20(3), 250-264.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009-.02.024
Costley, J., & Lange, C. (2017). The effects of lecture diversity on germane load. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 27-46.‏ https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2860
Huang, W., Eades, P., & Hong, S Huang, W., Eades, P., & Hong, S. (2009). Measuring effectiveness of graph visualizations: A cognitive load perspective. Information Visualization, 8(3), 139-152.‏ https://doi.org/10.1057/ivs.2009.10
Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional science, 38(2), 105-134.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0
Kalyuga, S. (2009). Knowledge elaboration: A cognitive load perspective. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 402-410.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.le-arninstruc.2009.02.003
Lin, H., & Chen, T. (2006). Decreasing cognitive load for novice EFL learners: Effects of question and descriptive advance organizers in facilitating EFL learners’ comprehension of an animation-based content lesson. System, 34(3), 416-431.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.200 6.04.008
Merrienboer, J., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational psychology review, 17(2), 147-177.‏ Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23363899
Paas, F., & Merriënboer, J. (1994a) Paas, F., & Merriënboer, J. (1994a). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational psychology review, 6, 351-371.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213420
Paas, F., & Merriënboer, J. , 1994a, Beckmann, J. (2010). Taming a beast of burden–On some issues with the conceptualisation and operationalisation of cognitive load. Learning and instruction, 20(3), 250-264.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009-.02.024
Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational psychology review, 19(14), 469-508.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9053-4
Skuballa, I., Xu, K., & Jarodzka, H. (2019). The impact of co-actors on cognitive load: when the mere presence of others makes learning more difficult. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 30-41.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.016
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. Mestre, & B. Ross (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37-76). Academic Press.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
Sweller, J. (2016). Working memory, long-term memory, and instructional design. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(4), 360–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.12.002
Sweller, J., Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, 251-296.‏ Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23359412
Sweller, J., Merriënboer, J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261-292.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Sweller, J., Merriënboer, J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261-292.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Van Gog, T., Ericsson, K., Rikers, R., & Paas, F. (2005). Instructional design for advanced learners: Establishing connections between the theoretical frameworks of cognitive load and deliberate practice. Educational Technology Research, 53(3), 73-81.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504799

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics