(20) Recommendations for the general descriptors of psychological models.

الدرينــى, حســين عبد العزيـــز

doi:10.21608/jsrep.2025.437735

(20) Recommendations for the general descriptors of psychological models.

Document Type : Original Article

Author

حســين عبد العزيـــز الدرينــى

استاذ علم النفس التعليمي المتفرغ كلية التربية جامعة الأزهر بالقاهرة

10.21608/jsrep.2025.437735

Abstract

There are different kinds of models in the various fields of psychology (PMs).
PMs are used for interpreting, and predicting psychological issues in order to build theories.
PMs have two sets of descriptors special and general. Special descriptors stem from the model’s topic and its field. General descriptors are methodological and should be in any model whatever it’s topic or field.
As for the general descriptors each PM should have an objective, makes use of previous literature and empirical factors, is built upon certain postulates and prepositions, simple, testable, communicable, flexible, modifiable and has internal and external validity.

Keywords

References

1- Keeves, J.P. Models and model building. In John P. Keeves. Educational research methodology and measurement. N.Y. Pergamon Press,1990.
2- Lord, G, Robert & , Maher J. Karen. Alternative information processing models and their implications for theory, research and practice. The Academy of Management Review, 1990, 15, 1, 9 – 25.
3- Lubart, L. Tedd. Models of creative process: past, present and future. Creativity Research J. 2001, v.13 295-308.
4- Luce, R. Duncan. Four tensions concerning mathematical modeling in psychology. In Janet T. Spence, John M. Darley & Donald J. Foss. Annual Review of Psychology. 1995, V. 46.
5- Massaro, Dominic & Nelson, Cowan. Information processing models microscopes of the mind. Annual Review of Psychology, 1993, 44.
6- Miyake, Akira & Pritishah. Models of working memory. London: Cambridge Press, 2003.
7- Nuthal, G. & Snook, IContemporary models of teaching. In Robert Travers. Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago Rand McNally pub. Co., 1973, 47 – 76.
8- Rusbult, Craig. A detailed examination of scientific method. A detailed examination. Htm, 2003,
http://www.asa.3org/ASA/education/think/detailshtm
9- Snow, R. Theory construction for research on teaching. In Robert M. Travers. Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: McNally pub. Co., 1973.
10- Tomas, Murray. Comparing theories of child development. California: Wadsworth pub. Co. 1979.
11- Torrance E. P. Instructional model for enhancing incubation. J. of Creative Behavior, 1979, V. 13,No. I, P. 23 – 35.
مراجع أجنبية عامة ( مواضع متفرقة )
12- Gert, V. P. & MoS, L.P. (Eds) Annals of theoretical psychology. N. Y. Plenum press, 1991.
13- Madsen, K. B. & Mos L.P. Annals of theoretical psychology. N. Y. Plenum press, 1985.
14- Mark, H. Melvin & Goodson, E-Flix. Theoriesin contemporary psychology. N. Y. Macmillan Book Co., 1976.
15- Mos, L. P. (Eds) Annals of theoretical psychology. N. Y. Plenum press, 1986.
16- Robinson, D.N. & Mos, L. P. (Eds). Annals of theoretical psychology. N. Y. Plenum press, 1990.
17- Royce, J. R. & Mos, L. P. (Eds). Annals of theoretical psychology. N. Y. Plenum press, 1984.
18- Staats, A. & Mos. L. P. (Eds). Annals of theoretical psychology. N. Y. Plenum press, 1992.