The Interaction Between the Density of Embedded Questions and the Timing of Presentation in Interactive Video Through a Digital Platform and Its Impact on Enhancing Educational Satisfaction and The Retention of Learning Effects Among Educational Technology Students

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Assistant Professor of Educational Technology, Faculty of Specific Education, Fayoum University.

Abstract

The research aimed to measure the effect of the interaction between the density of embedded questions (low-high) and the timing of presentation (during- end) interactive video via a digital platform on the development of achievement, educational satisfaction, and retention of learning effects among educational technology students. The sample comprised 76 students from the Department of Educational Technology at Fayoum University, randomly selected and divided into four experimental groups. The achievement test and the educational satisfaction scale were used as research tools. Results indicated no statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the experimental groups in the post-achievement test and the delayed test, attributed to the density of embedded questions in interactive video. However, results showed statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the experimental groups in the post-achievement test and the delayed test, attributed to the timing of the question presentation, favoring the embedded questions style (during) interactive video. Results indicated no statistically significant differences between the average scores of the experimental groups in the post-test and the delayed test due to the interaction between embedded questions and the timing of the presentation. Furthermore, the findings showed that the density of embedded questions or the presentation timing had no discernible effect on the mean scores of the experimental groups on the educational satisfaction scale post-test. The results also demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the educational satisfaction scale post-test due to the interaction between the density of embedded questions and the presentation timing.   

Keywords

References

Afifi, M. (2020). Effect of interactive video length within e-learning environments on cognitive load, cognitive achievement and retention of learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 4(21), 68-89.
Alqahtani, M., & Mohammad, H. (2015). Mobile applications' impact on student performance and satisfaction. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(4), 102-112.
Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning, and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, 62, 102–110.
Bolliger, D., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses, International Journal of E-Learning, 3(1), 61-67.
Buchner, J. (2018). How to create educational videos: from watching passively to learning actively. open online journal for research and education, special issue, 12, 1-10
Deng, J., Russakovsky, O., Krause, J., Bernstein, M., Berg, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2014). Scalable multi-label annotation. In CHI 2014: One of a CHInd - Conference Proceedings, 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3099-3102.
Dieck-Assad, G., Hinojosa-Olivares, J. M. & Colomer-Farrarnos, J. (2020). Study of the effectiveness of interactive videos in applied electronics courses. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 14, 983–1001
Gedera, D. & Zalipour, A. (2018): Use of interactive video for teaching and learning, learning without borders, Concise Paper Ascilite 2018 Deakin University, 362-367.
Harris, L. (2007). Employing formative assessment in the classroom. Improving Schools, 10(3), 249-260. ‏
Ke, F., & Kwak, D. (2013), Constructs of student-centered online learning on learning satisfaction of a diverse online student body: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(1), 97-122.
Kim, J., Glassman, E. L., Monroy-Hernández, A., & Morris, M. R. (2015).  Embedding interactive multimedia exercises in lecture videos. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, 1535-1544.‏
Koçdar, S. (2018). Using question embedded interactive videos for formative e-assessment. The Envisioning Report for Empowering Universities, European Association of Distance Teaching Universities (EADTU). George Ubachs; Lizzie Konings.
Lasecki, W., Gordon, M., Koutra, D., Jung, M., Dow, S., & Bigham, J. (2014). Glance: Rapidly coding behavioral video with the crowd. UIST 2014 - Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology,
Lim, H. & Wilson, D. (2018). Flipped learning: embedding questions in videos. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 23(7) , 378-385.
 Marshall, A. (2016). The Effect of embedded questions strategy in video among graduate students at a Middle Eastern university. Doctoral Dissertation, The Patton College of Education, Ohio University.
Marshall, F. (2019). The effect of embedded questions at different temporal locations and performance, PhD (Doctor of Philosophy) thesis, College of Education, Florida State University.
Mayer, R. (2009). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
Meixner, B. (2014). Annotated Interactive Non-linear Video. Doctoral dissertation, University of Passau.
Nagy, J. (2018). Evaluation of online video usage and learning satisfaction: an extension of the technology acceptance model. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19 (1), 160-185.
Pulukuri, S., & Abrams, B. (2020). Incorporating an online interactive video platform to optimize active learning and improve student accountability through educational videos.‏ Journal of Chemical Education, 97 (12),      4505-4514
Rice, P., Bceson, P., & Blackmore-Wright, J. (2019). Evaluating the impact of the quiz question within an educational video. TechTrends, 63(1), 522-532.
Schunk, D. (2016). Learning theories: an educational perspective (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson
Sigurdsson, G., Russakovsky, O., Farhadi, A., Laptev, I., & Gupta, A. (2016). Much ado about time: exhaustive annotation of temporal data. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, 4.10.
Singh, H. (2005). Learner satisfaction in a collaborative online learning environment. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on E-learning/4th International Conference on Information (pp. 1-3).
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem-solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285
Szpunar, K., Khan, N., & Schacter, D. (2013). Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(16), 6313 -6317.
Tweissi, A. (2016). The Effect of Embedded Questions Strategy in video among graduate students at a Middle Eastern University. Doctoral Dissertation, The Patton College of Education, Ohio University.
Van Der Meij, H., & Bӧckmann, L. (2021). Effects of embedded questions in recorded lectures. Journal of computing in higher education, 33(1), 235- 254.‏
Vijayanarasimhan, S., & Grauman, K. (2012). Active frame selection for label propagation in videos. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 496-509.
Vondrick, C., Patterson, D., & Ramanan, D. (2013). Efficiently scaling up crowdsourced video annotation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 101(1), 184–204.
Vural, O. F. (2013). The impact of a question-embedded video-based learning tool on e-learning. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 1315-1323.‏
Wachtler, J., Michael, H., Helmut, Z., Martin, E. (2016). An analysis of the use and effect of questions in interactive learning videos. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1):13-29. doi: 10.1186/S40561-016-0033-3
Wright, L., Newman, L., & Teese, R. (2016). Web-Based interactive video vignettes create a personalized active learning classroom for introducing big ideas in introductory biology. Journal of College Biology Teaching, 42(2), 32-43.
Zalipour, A. (2016). Learning through screen and the learner’s emotional knowledge. Association of Visual Pedagogies. Zagreb, Croatia.
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics