أثر التعليم القائم على اللغويات المعرفية في مقابل التعليم المدعوم بالمهام في تنمية تعلم الکلام غير المباشر لدى طلاب اللغة الإنجليزية کلغة أجنبية. Comparing the effects of cognitive linguistics to task-supported instruction in developing EFL students learning of Reported Speech

ابراهيم, هاني ابراهيم أحمد

doi:10.21608/jsrep.2019.88378

أثر التعليم القائم على اللغويات المعرفية في مقابل التعليم المدعوم بالمهام في تنمية تعلم الکلام غير المباشر لدى طلاب اللغة الإنجليزية کلغة أجنبية. Comparing the effects of cognitive linguistics to task-supported instruction in developing EFL students learning of Reported Speech

نوع المستند : بحوث فی مجال أصول التربیة والتربیة الإسلامیة

المؤلف

هاني ابراهيم أحمد ابراهيم

أستاذ مناهج وطرق تدريس اللغة الإنجليزية المشارک بکلية التربية جامعة الأزهر

10.21608/jsrep.2019.88378

المستخلص

Due to its internal complexity, reported speech is a challenge for EFL learners. Most ESL/EFL learners get perplexed when reading grammar books and the explanations of their meaning and usage. As a solution, cognitive linguistic research, based on theory of conceptual blending and mirroring human cognition processes, is suggested to be of benefit for students. In this study, elements of cognitive linguistic analysis of English reported speech was incorporated into EFL learning materials. The research questions explored the influence of types of instruction for EFL development of English reported speech, as measured by a post-test, and a delayed post-test. Based on a quasi-experimental design, the participants of the study (N. 57) were distributed randomly on three groups: cognitive, task-supported, and control. Pedagogic consciousness-raising tasks were utilized to provide a context for meaningful practices for cognitive and task-supported groups. The statistical analysis revealed that participants from the cognitive and task supported groups outperformed the participants from the control group and that of the cognitive group outperformed that of the task supported.

الكلمات الرئيسية

الموضوعات الرئيسية

بحوث تربوية

المراجع

Achard, M., & Niemeier, S. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching, 18.

Bielak, J. (2011). Cognitive linguistics and foreign language pedagogy: An overview of recent trends and developments. In M. Pawlak (ed.): Extending the boundaries of research on second language learning and teaching (pp. 241-262). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Bielak, J., & Pawlak, M. (2011). Teaching English tense and aspect with the help of cognitive grammar: An empirical study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3, 365-400

Bin Tahir, S. Z. (2017). Multilingual teaching and learning at Pesantren Schools in Indonesia. Asian EFL Journal, 89, 74-94.

Boers, F. (2011). Cognitive Semantic ways of teaching figurative phrases. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9.1, 227–261.

Boers, F., S. Lindstromberg, J. Littlemore, H. Stengers&J. Eyckmans (2008).Variables in the mnemonic effectiveness of pictorial elucidation. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (eds.), 189–216.

Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (Eds.). (2008). Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (Vol. 6). Walter de Gruyter.

Cadierno, T. (2008). Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 249-285). Routledge.

Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1983). The Grammar book: an ESL/EFL teacher’s course. New York: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

Crivos, M. B., & Luchini, P. L. (2012). A pedagogical proposal for teaching grammar using consciousness-raising tasks. MJAL, 4(3), 141-153.

De la Fuente, M. J. (2006). Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: Investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction. Language teaching research, 10(3), 263-295.

Dekeyser, R., & Prieto Botana, G. (2014). The effectiveness of processing instruction in L2 grammar acquisition: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 290-305.

Drobot, I. A. (2015). Teaching English Reported Speech to Engineering Students. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(6), 749-752.

Eckerth, J. (2008). Investigating consciousness‐raising tasks: pedagogically targeted and non‐targeted learning gains. International journal of applied linguistics, 18(2), 119-145.

Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition, 24(2), 143-188.

Ellis, R. (2009). Task‐based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International journal of applied linguistics, 19(3), 221-246.

Ellis, R. (2011). Macro-and micro-evaluations of task-based teaching. In Materials development in language teaching (pp. 212-235). Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (2017). Task-based language teaching. In The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 124-141). Routledge.

Fauconnier, R., Gilles, M. & Turner, M. (2003). The Way We Think. New York: Basic Books.

Fordyce, K. (2013). The differential effects of explicit and implicit instruction on EFL learners’ use of epistemic stance. Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 6-28.

Geeraerts, D. & H. Cuyckens (eds.) (2007). The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Holme, R. (2009). Cognitive Linguistics and language teaching. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Hu, Y.

Irina, A. D. (2015). Teaching reported speech to engineering students. American Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 3, No. 6, 749-752

Lindstromberg, S. (2010). English prepositions explained (2nd edn). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lindstromberg, S. & F. Boers (2005). From movement to metaphor with manner-of-movement verbs. Applied Linguistics 26, 241–261.

Littlemore, J. (2009). Applying Cognitive Linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Liu, D. (2010). Going beyond patterns: Involving cognitive analysis in the learning of collocations. TESOL Quarterly 44, 4–30.

Long, M. H. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. Language policy and pedagogy: Essays in honor of A. Ronald Walton, 179-192.

Madlener, K. (2015). Frequency effects in instructed second language acquisition (Vol. 29). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.

Maier,E. (2015). Quotation and unquotation in free indirect discourse. Mind & Language, 30(3), 345–373. http://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12083

Matsumoto, N. (2008). Bridges between cognitive linguistics and second language pedagogy: The case of corpora and their potential. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 21, 125-153.

Niemeier, S., & Reif, M. (2008). Making progress simpler? Applying cognitive grammar to tense-aspect teaching in the German EFL classroom. Applications of cognitive linguistics, 9, 325.

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta‐analysis. Language learning, 50(3), 417-528.

Pishghadam, R., Khodadady, E., & Rad, N. D. (2011). The Effect of Form versus Meaning-Focused Tasks on the Development of Collocations among Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 180-189.

Puspitasari, A. (2007). A study on the mastery and errors of reported speech. An unpublished MA thesis presented to Sanata Dharma University, Indonesia.

Recanati, F.(2001). Open quotation. Mind, 110(439), 637–687. http://doi.org/10.1093/mind/110.439.637

Révész, A. (2011). Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom‐based study. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 162-181.

Robinson, P., Cadierno, T., & Shirai, Y. (2009). Time and motion: Measuring the effects of the conceptual demands of tasks on second language speech production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 533-554.

Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. Routledge.

Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Schmidt, R. W. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sharwood Smith, M. (2007). Language attrition by processing: A MOGUL account. In Köpke, B., Schmid, M. S., Keijzer, M., & Dostert,S. (Eds.), Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Simon, C., & Jerry, H. (2019). Grammar in the Syllabus: Grammar learning activities in textbooks assigned for the first year speaking and listening course at a Japanese University. Available online at: http://hdl.handle.net/10112/16841

Smith, D. (2010). Teaching reported speech for writing: A game approach. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. XVI, No. 3

Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta‐analysis. Language learning, 60(2), 263-308.

Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard University Press.

Tyler, W. (2012). School Organisation (RLE Edu L): A Sociological Perspective. Routledge.

Tyler, A. (2012). Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. Routledge.

Tyler, A. & V. Evans (2004). Applying cognitive linguistics to pedagogical grammar: The case of over. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 257–280).

Tyler, A., C. M. Mueller & V. Ho (2010). Applying cognitive linguistics to instructed L2 learning: The English modals. AILA Review 23, 30–49.

Van den Branden, K. (2009). Mediating between predetermined order and chaos: the role of the teacher in task‐based language education. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 264-285.

Yasuda, S. (2010). Learning phrasal verbs through conceptual metaphors: A case of Japanese EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly 44, 250–273.