تقييم استخدام البيانات الضخمة في المؤسسات التعليمية باستخدام مدخل متعدد المعايير لاتخاذ القرار Evaluating Big Data Use in Educational Institutions Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach

العماري, عبدالله محمد

doi:10.21608/jsrep.2020.84439

تقييم استخدام البيانات الضخمة في المؤسسات التعليمية باستخدام مدخل متعدد المعايير لاتخاذ القرار Evaluating Big Data Use in Educational Institutions Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach

نوع المستند : بحوث فی مجال المناهج وطرق التدریس

المؤلف

عبدالله محمد العماري

قسم المناهج والتدريس، کلية التربية، جامعة أم القرى، المملکة العربية السعودية.

10.21608/jsrep.2020.84439

المستخلص

المؤسسات التعليمية أصبحت تعتمد على البيانات الضخمة مؤخراً. لذلک من المهم لصناع القرار في المنظمات التعليمية بشکل عام والجامعات بشکل خاص تبني التقنيات والأدوات المساعدة للإستفادة من البيانات الضخمة في إتخاذ القرارات لتطوير جميع الجوانب المتعلقة بالعمليات التعليمية. إن التعامل مع البيانات الضخمة لإتخاذ القرارات المناسبة يعبر عنه علمياً بأنه مشکلة, وتسمى هذه المشکلة (مشکلة اتخاذ القرارات متعددة المعايير MCDM). ولمعالجة هذه المشکلة (MCDM)، أجرينا تقييمًا بواسطة بعض الخبراء باستخدام تقنية Fuzzy TOPSIS (تقنية ترتيب الأفضليات عن طريق التشابه مع الحلول المثالية) لثلاث جامعات سعودية حکومية فيما يتعلق باستخدام بياناتها الضخمة. هذا البحث يهدف إلى تقييم قوة استخدام البيانات الضخمة في المنظمات التعليمية من عوامل تعلم الطلاب والتدريس والإدارة.
Educational institutions are now days rely on the Big Data; therefore, it is important for decision makers to make helpful use of the Big Data, which is a multi-criterion decision-making problem (MCDM). To address this MCDM problem, we conducted expert’s evaluation using Fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) of three Saudi public Universities regarding the use of their Big Data. This paper aims to evaluate the strength for the Big Data use from student learning, teaching and administration factors.

الكلمات الرئيسية

الموضوعات الرئيسية

تکنولوجيا التعليم

المراجع

1) المراجع الأجنبية:

- Al. Othman, F.A., Sohaib, O. (2016). Enhancing Innovative Capability and Sustainability of Saudi Firms, Sustainability, 8, pp. 1229.

- Amershi, S.; and Conati, C. (2009). Combining unsupervised and supervised classification to build user models for exploratory learning environments. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 1(1), 18-71.

- Attar, MMO, Kang, K-S and Sohaib, O. (2019), Knowledge Sharing Practices, Intellectual Capital and Organizational Performance. 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Grand Wailea, pp. 5578-5587.

- Baker, R. S. J. D., & Siemens, G. (2013). Educational data mining and learning analytics. Cambridge University.

- Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In Learning analytics (pp. 61-75).

- Bamiah,, M. A.; Brohi, S. N., Rad, B. B. (2018). Big data technology in education: advantages, implementations, and challenges. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Special Issue on ICCSIT 2018, July (2018) 229 - 241

- Bhat, A. Z., & Ahmed, I. (2016, March). Big data for institutional planning, decision support, and academic excellence. In 2016 Third MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City (ICBDSC) (pp. 1–5). Muscat, IEEE.

- Bienkowski, M.; Feng, M.; and Means, B. (2012). Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: an issue brief. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. Washington, D.C., Retrived August 12, 2019, from https://tech.ed.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/edm-la-brief.pdf.

- Brohi, S.; Bamiah, M.; and Brohi, M. (2016). Identifying and analyzing the transient and permanent barriers for big data. Journal of Engineering Science and Technolog, 11(12), 1793 - 1807.

- Bueckle, A., Ginda, M., Ranga Suri, N. N. R., & B€orner, K. (2017). Empowering instructors in learning management systems: interactive heat map analytics dashboard. Retrieved September 2, 2019, from http://cns. slis.indiana.edu/docs/publications /2016%20 ginda%20 LAK17%20submit.pdf

- Chen S.-J. and Hwang, C.-L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods, in Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making, ed: Springer, pp. 289-486.

- Ali, W. G. M. (2012). Factors affecting nursing student’s satisfaction with e-learning experience in King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia. dimension, 5, 13-18

- Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the course: Online education in the United States. Online Learning Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/staying-the-course.pdf

- Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2015). Grade level: Tracking online education in the United States. Online Learning Consortium. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/survey-reports-2014/

- Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Seaman, J. E. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580852.pdf

- Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. Theory and Practice of Online Learning, 2, 15–44.

- Al-Salman, S. (2013). The role of faculty in the effectiveness of fully online programs (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. (3565063)

- Alubthne, F. (2018). Exploring the Quality Needs of Saudi Electronic University Students: A Learner Perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio University, Ohio. Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=ohiou1518699469954247&disposition=inline

- Aman, P. R. (2009). Improving learner satisfaction and retention with online instruction through systematic faculty peer review of courses. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.

- Andresen, M. A. (2009). Asynchronous discussion forums: success factors, outcomes, assessments, and limitations. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 249–257.

- Ally, M. (2008.). Foundations of Educational Theory for Online Learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The Theory and practice of Online Learning (pp. 3-31). Retrieved from https://auspace.athabascau.ca/bitstream/handle/2149/411/?sequence=1

- Armstrong, D. (2010). A Qualitative Study of Undergraduate Students’ Approaches, Perceptions, and Use of Online Tools. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Document ID 742477661. Retrieved from https://repository.usfca.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1382&context=diss

- Bailey, C. J., & Card, K. A. (2009). Effective pedagogical practices for online teaching: Perception of experienced instructors. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3), 152–155.