أثر التفاعل بين أسلوب التقويم ونمط التغذية الراجعة التصحيحية عبر المنصــات الرقميــة في تنميـــة فاعلية الذات البحثية واتخاذ القرار المهني لدى طلاب الدراسات العليا The effect of the interaction between an evaluation method and the corrective feedback pattern via digital platforms in developing research self-efficacy and professional decision-making among

نوع المستند : بحوث فی مجال المناهج وطرق التدریس

المؤلف

استاذ تکنولوجيا التعليم المساعد کلية التربية النوعية - جامعة عين شمس

المستخلص

هدفت هذه الدراسة إلى قياس أثر التفاعل بين تصميم أسلوب التقويم ونمط التغذية الراجعة التصحيحية عبر المنصات الرقمية وتأثيره في تنمية فاعلية الذات البحثية وإتخاذ القرارالمهني لدي طلاب الدراسات العليا، تم استخدام المنهج شبه التجريبي بالاعتماد على التصميم العاملي (2×3). تکونت عينة البحث من(90) طالبًا من باحثين الدراسات العليا في مرحلة الماجستير بتخصص تکنولوجيا التعليم، وقد قسموا عشوائيًا إلى (6) مجموعات تجريبية قوام کل منها (15) باحثًا. وکانت أداتا الدراسة مقياس فاعلية الذات البحثية وتکون من (5) أبعاد وهما: المبادرة والمثابرة البحثية، التخطيط البحثي، المجهود البحثي، طلب المساعدة البحثية، فاعلية الکتابة البحثية، وتضمنت (40) مفردة، ومقياس إتخاذ القرار المهني تضمنت (40) مفردة. أظهرت النتائج المرتبطة بکل من فاعلية الذات البحثية وإتخاذ القرار المهني فاعلية أسلوب المناقشات بالمقارنة مع أسلوب المقابلات بالفيديو عبر المنصة الرقمية، وفاعلية التغذية الراجعة التصحيحية بعد المناقشة مع الأقران بالمقارنة مع التغذية الراجعة التصحيحية بعد المناقشة مع المعلم والتغذية الراجعة التصحيحية المباشرة، کما أسفرت النتائج عن عدم وجود فروق دالة إحصائية ترجع إلى الأثر الأساسي للتفاعل بين تصميم أسلوب التقويم ونمط التغذية الراجعة التصحيحية عبر المنصات الرقمية.
This study aimed to measure the effect of the interaction between designing an evaluation method and a corrective feedback pattern via digital platforms and its impact in developing research self-efficacy and professional decision-making among post-graduate students, a semi-experimental approach was used based on global design (2 × 3). The research sample consisted of (90) post-graduate students in the master's degree in the field of educational technology were divided randomly into (6)experimental groups consist of (15)researchers each. The study aimed to measure a research self-efficacy and consisted of (5) dimensions: research initiative and perseverance, research planning, research effort, seeking research assistance, research writing effectiveness, and included (40) singular, and the scale of professional decision-making included (40) singular. The results related to both research self-efficacy and professional decision-making showed the effectiveness of the discussion method compared with the video interview method via the digital platform, and the effectiveness of the corrective feedback after discussion with pairs compared with the corrective feedback after discussion with the teacher and the direct corrective feedback. The results showed that there were no statistical differences due to the main effect of the interaction between the design of the evaluation method and the corrective feedback pattern via the digital platforms.

الكلمات الرئيسية

الموضوعات الرئيسية


  1. المراجع العربية:

    1. الشرقاوی، أ. م. (2012). التعلم: نظریات وتطبیقات. القاهرة: مکتبة الأنجلو المصریة.
    2. مدکور، أ. ف. خ. (2014). مصدر التقویم التکوینی (المعلم- الأقران- الذات) ببیئة تعلم إلکترونیة تفاعلیة وتأثیره على أداء الطلاب والتفکیر الابتکاری فی إنتاج الرسوم التعلیمیة بالکمبیوتر، مجلة الجمعیة المصریة لتکنولوجیا التعلیم،24(2)، مصر، 165 – 229، مسترجع من https://search.mand  umah.com/Record/699815
    3. أحمد، ب. إ. (2017). فاعلیة الذات البحثیة لدی طلبة الدراسات العلیا بالجامعات الحکومیة العربیة: دراسة مقارنة فی ضوء بعض المتغیرات الدیموجرافیة. مجلة الإرشاد النفسی، 50(1)، مرکز الإرشاد النفسی، جامعة عین شمس،  1-48.
    4. عبد العاطی، ح. ب. (2011). مشارکات الطلاب فی منتدیات المناقشة عبر الإنترنت وتصوراتهم بشأن استخدامها فی دعم دراسة مقرر تکنولوجیا التعلیم والمعلومات. مجلة الجمعیة المصریة لتکنولوجیا التعلیم، 21(4)، مصر، 163-214، مسترجع من:  https://search.mand  umah.com/Record/623205
    5. زیتون، ح. ح. (2003). استراتیجیات التدریس:  رؤیة معاصرة لطرق التعلیم والتعلم. القاهرة: عالم الکتب.
    6. حسانین، ح. ع. والشهری، م. (2016). فاعلیة استخدام التقویم التکوینى الإلکترونى في خفض قلق الاختبار والدوافع للانجاز الاکادیمى لدى الطالب المعلم للریاضیات بجامعة نجران. مجلة تربویات الریاضیات، 19(7). مصر.
    7. عبد العزیز، ح. أ. (2008). التعلیم الالکترونی: الفلسفة– المبادئ– الأدوات – التطبیقات. عمان: دار الفکر.
    8. رمود، ر. ع. (2013).التفاعل بین مستوى التغذیة الراجعة ( تفصیلیة، موجزة) وتوقیت تقدیمها بالمقررات الإلکترونیة وأثره فی التحصیل وتنمیة التفکیر البصری لدى طلاب کلیة التربیة. مجلة تکنولوجیا التعلیم، 23(4)، مصر، 71-113، مسترجع من:  http://search.mand  umah.com/Record/699757
      1. أحمد، ر. ع. (2017). أثر التفاعل بین مستوى تقدیم التغذیة الراجعة (تصحیحیة - تفسیریة) وأسلوب التعلم (سطحی - عمیق) فی بیئات التعلم الشخصیة على التحصیل الدراسی وکفاءة التعلم لدى طلاب تکنولوجیا التعلیم. تکنولوجیا التربیة – دراسات وبحوث،  الجمعیة العربیة لتکنولوجیا  التربیة 31، جامعة القاهرة، ، 253-306، مسترجع من: http://search.mand  umah.com/Record/844446
      2. مرعی، س. م. (2014). فاعلیة برنامج حاسوبی متعدد الوسائط قائم على اختلاف نوع التغذیة الراجعة فی إکساب الدعاة مهارات الاتصال الإقناعی. مجلة التربیة للبحوث التربویة والنفسیة والاجتماعیة، 157(3)، مصر، 329-374، مسترجع من:  http://search.mand  umah.com/Record/649823
      3. دسوقی، ش. م. وعبد المطلب، س. ف. (2009). فاعلیة برنامج تعلیمی فی ضوء نظریة الذکاءات المتعددة علی التحصیل الدراسی وفاعلیة الذات فی الریاضیات لدی تلامیذ الصف السادس الأبتدائی ذوی صعوبات تعلم الریاضیات. مجلة کلیة التربیة، 19(80)، جامعة بنها،  110-154، مسترجع من:https://search.mand  umah.com/Record/45863
      4. علام، ص. (2007). التقویم التربوی البدیل : أسسه النظریة والمنهجیة وتطبیقاته المیدانیة. القاهرة: دار الفکر العربی.
      5. إسماعیل، غ. ز. (2009). التعلم الإلکترونی من التطبیق إلی الاحتراف والجودة. القاهرة: دار عالم الکتب للنشر والتوزیع.
      6. إسماعیل، غ. ز. (2012). المقررات الإلکترونیة: تصمیمها – إنتاجها – نشرها – تطبیقها–  تقویمها. القاهرة: دار عالم الکتب للنشر والتوزیع.
      7. فهیم مصطفی، ف. (2005). مدرسة المستقبل ومجالات التعلیم عن بعد: استخدام الإنترنت فی المدارس والجامعات وتعلیم الکبار، القاهرة، دار الفکر العربی.
      8. زیتون، ک. ع. (2008). تصمیم البرامج التعلیمیة بفکر البنائیة: تأصیل فکری... وبحث إمبریقی. القاهرة: عالم الکتب.
      9. عبد الحمید، م. (2013). البحث العلمی فی تکنولوجیا التعلیم. القاهرة: عالم الکتب.
      10. سعودی، م. م. خ. والبسیونی، م. م. (2003). أثر تفاعل کل مـن الفاعلیة الذاتیة والتغذیة الراجعة فی التحصیل الدراسی لدى عینة من طلاب کلیة التربیة جامعة الأزهر، مجلة کلیة التربیة،114 (1)،  جامعة الأزهر، 179-2017، مسترجع من:https://search.mand  umah.com/Record/229592
      11. سراج الدین، م. س. وجعفر، د. ع. (2017). اختلاف مصدر التغذیة الراجعة فى الشبکات الاجتماعیة الالکترونیة وأثره على تنمیة الأداء المهارى لدى طلاب الاقتصاد المنزلى فى مقرر أدوات وماکینات الحیاکة. مجلة بحوث عربیة فی مجالات التربیة النوعیة، 7، رابطة التربویین العرب، 35 – 101، مسترجع من: https://search.mand  umah.com/Record/827420
      12. عبد السمیع، م. وجامع، ح. وعبد المقصود، م. أبو ریة، و. (2014). أثر بیئة التقویم البنائی الإلکترونی القائمة على نمط تقدیم التغذیة الراجعة بین الأقران فی إکساب مهارات البرمجة والدافعیة نحو التعلم. تکنولوجیا التربیة – دراسات وبحوث،  الجمعیة العربیة لتکنولوجیا  التربیة، جامعة القاهرة، مصر،199 -231، مسترجع من: http://search.mand  umah.com/Record/788555
      13. أبو غزال، م. (2007). نظریات التطور الإنسانی وتطبیقاتها التربویة. ط2، عمان: دار المسیرة.
      14. مبارز، م. (2014). اختلاف نوع التقویم القائم على الأداء باستراتیجیة التعلم بالمشروعات القائ معلى الویب وأثره على تنمیة مهارات حل المشکلات وقوة السیطرة المعرفیة في مقرر الکمبیوتر وتکنولوجیا المعلومات لدى طلاب المرحلة الإعدادیة. مجلة تکنولوجیا التعلیم،24(1)، الجمعیة المصریة لتکنولوجیا التعلیم، مصر، 239-279، مسترجع من:http://search.mand  umah.com/Record/699789
      15. مبارز، م. (2014). أنواع التغذیة الراجعة التصحیحیة ببیئة التعلم المدمج الدوار وأثرها على کفاءة التعلم والحاجة إلى المعرفة لدى طلاب الدراسات العلیا. مجلة تکنولوجیا التعلیم، 24(4)،  الجمعیة المصریة لتکنولوجیا التعلیم،147-210، مسترجع من: http://search.mand  umah.com/Record/699853
      16. عزمی، ن. ع. ( 2014). تکنولوجیا التعلیم الإلکترونی. ط2، القاهرة: دار الفکر العربی.
      17. عزمی، ن. ج. والمرادنی، م. م. (2009). أثر التفاعل بین توقیت تقدیم التغذیة الراجعة البصریة ضمن صفحات الویب التعلیمیة والأسلوب المعرفی لتلامیذ المرحلة الابتدائیة فی التحصیل المعرفی والاتجاه نحو التعلم من مواقع الویب التعلیمیة.مجلة تکنولوجیا التعلیم،19(3)، الجمعیة المصریة لتکنولوجیا التعلیم، مصر،  161-205، مسترجع من: http://search.mand  umah.com/Record/80949
      18. محمد، ه. ه. (2017). استخدام منصة Edmodo في تنمیة مهارات التعلم المنظم ذاتیاً والاتجاه نحو توظیفها في تدریس الدراسات الاجتماعیة لطلاب الدبلوم العام بکلیة التربیة. مجلة الجمعیة التربویة للدراسات الاجتماعیة، 90، جامعة عین شمس، کلیة التربیة، 99-139، مسترجع من :http://search.mand  umah.com/Record/834309
      19. الحلفاوی، و. س. والعطیفی، م. ف. وزکی، م.(2017). نموذج مقترح لمنصة فنیة عبر الویب وقیاس فاعلیتها فی تنمیة التفکیر الإبداعی لدى الطلاب المعلمین فی التربیة الفنیة. المؤتمر العلمی الرابع والدولی الثانی: التعلیم النوعی- تحدیات الحاضر ورؤى المستقبل، جامعة عین شمس، کلیة التربیة النوعیة ، مج3، 597 – 634، مسترجع من https://search.mand  umah.com/Record/868200

     

    1)  Arabic References in English:

    1. Al-Sharqawy, A. M. (2012). Learning: Theories and     Applications. Cairo: The Anglo-Egyptian BookshoA.

    2. Medkour, A. A.  Kh. (2014). The source for formative evaluation (teacher - peer - self) in an interactive electronic learning environment and     its impact on students' performance and     innovative thinking in producing educational drawings by computer, Journal of the Egyptian Association for Educational Technology, 24 (2), Egypt, 165 - 229, retrieved from https: // search Mand  umah.com / Record / 699 815

    3. Ahmed, b. a. (2017). The effectiveness of the research self for postgraduate students in Arab public universities: a comparative study According to some demographic variables. Journal of Psychological Counseling, 50 (1), Center for Psychological Counseling, Ain Shams University, 1-48.

    4. Abdel Ati, H. B. (2011). Students' participation in online discussion forums and     their perceptions regarding its use in support of the study of an information and     educational technology course. Journal of the Egyptian Association for Educational Technology, 21 (4), Egypt, 163-214, retrieved from: https://search.mand  umah.com/Record/623205

    5. Zaytoon, H. H. (2003). Teaching Strategies: A contemporary view of teaching and     learning methods. Cairo: Alam Al-Kotob.

    6. Hassanin, H. A. Al-Shahri, M. (2016). The effectiveness of using the electronic formative assessment in reducing test anxiety and     motivations for academic achievement of the student teacher of mathematics at the University of Najran. Journal of Mathematics Education, 19 (7). Egypt.

    7. Abdel Aziz, H. A. (2008). E-learning: philosophy - principles - tools - applications. Amman: Dar Al Fikr.

    8. Ramod, R. A. (2013). The interaction between the level of feedback (detailed, brief) and     the timing of its presentation in electronic courses and     its impact on achievement and     development of visual thinking among students of the College of Education. Journal of Education Technology, 23 (4), Egypt, 71-113, retrieved from: http://search.mand  umah.com/Record/699757

    9. Ahmed, R. A.  (2017). The effect of the interaction between the level of feedback provision (corrective - explanatory) and     the learning style (superficial - deep) in personal learning environments on academic achievement and     learning efficiency of students of learning technology. Educational Technology - Studies and     Research, 31, Arab Association for Educational Technology, Cairo University, 253-306, retrieved from: http://search.mand  umah.com/Record/844446

    10. Mary, S. M. (2014). The effectiveness of a multi-media computer program based on the different type of feedback in providing advocates with persuasive communication skills. Journal of Education for Educational, Psychological and     Social Research, 157 (3), Egypt, 329-374, retrieved from: http://search.mand  umah.com/Record/649823

    11. Desouky, st. M. and     Abdul-Muttalib, S. A.  (2009). The effectiveness of an educational program in the light of the theory of multiple intelligences on academic achievement and     self-efficacy in mathematics for sixth-grade students who have difficulties learning mathematics. Faculty of Education Journal, 19 (80), Benha University, 110-154, retrieved from: https://search.mand  umah.com/Record/45863

    12. Allam, A.  (2007). The Alternative Educational Evaluation: Its Theoretical And     Methodological Foundations And     Its Field Applications. Cairo: Arab Thought House.

    13. Ismail, G. G. (2009). E-learning from application to professionalism and     quality. Cairo:  Alam Al-Kotob    for Publishing and     Distribution.

    14. Ismail, G. G. (2012). E-courses: design - production - dissemination - implementation - evaluation. Cairo:  Alam Al-Kotob    for Publishing and     Distribution.

    15. Fahim, M. F. (2005). The School of the Future and     the Fields of Distance Education: Using the Internet in Schools and     Universities, and     Educating Adults, Cairo: Dar Al Fikr Al Arabi.

    16. Zaitoon, K. A.  (2008). Designing educational programs with constructivism thinking: intellectual establishment ... and     Empirical research. Cairo:  Alam Al-Kotob    .

    17. Abdel Hamid, M. (2013). Scientific research in educational technology. Cairo:  Alam Al-Kotob    .

    18. Saudi, M. M. Kh. Al-Bassiouni, M. M. (2003). The effect of the interaction of both self-activity and     feedback on academic achievement of a sample of students of the Faculty of Education, Al-Azhar University, Journal of the Faculty of Education, 114 (1), Al-Azhar University, 179-2017, retrieved from: https://search.mand  umah.com/Record / 229592

    19. Siraj Al-Din, M. S. and     Jafar, D. A.  (2017). The difference in the source of the feedback in the electronic social networks and     its effect on the development of the skills performance of the students of home economics According to knitting tools and     machines. Arab Research Journal in the Fields of Specific Education, 7, Arab Educators Association, 101-35, retrieved from: https://search.mand  umah.com/Record/827420

    20. Abdul-Sami ', M. Jameh, H. and     Abdul-Maqsoud, M. Abu Rayyah. W. (2014). The impact of the electronic constructive evaluation environment based on the peer-to-peer feedback delivery pattern on acquiring programming skills and     motivation towards learning. Educational Technology - Studies and     Research, The Arab Association for Educational Technology, Cairo University, Egypt, 199-231, retrieved from: http://search.mand  umah.com/Record/788555

    21. Abu Ghazal, M. (2007). Theories of human development and     their educational applications.  (2nd ed.), Amman: Al Masirah House.

    22. Mobarez, M. (2014). The difference in the type of performance-based evaluation in the project-based learning strategy on the web and     its impact on the development of problem-solving skills and     the power of cognitive control in the computer and     information technology course among middle school students. Journal of Education Technology, 24 (1), Egyptian Association for Educational Technology, Egypt, 239-279, retrieved from: http://search.mand  umah.com/Record/699789

    23. Mobarez, M. (2014). Types of corrective feedback in a blended learning environment and     their impact on learning efficiency and     need for knowledge among postgraduate students. Educational Technology Journal, 24 (4), Egyptian Association for Educational Technology, 147-210, retrieved from: http://search.mand  umah.com/Record/699853

    24. Azmi, N. A.  (2014). E-learning technology.  (2nd ed.), Cairo: Dar Al Fikr Al Arabi.

    25. Azmi, N. C. Al-Mouradani, M. M. (2009). The effect of the interaction between the timing of providing visual feedback within the educational web pages and     the cognitive style of elementary school students on cognitive achievement and     the trend towards learning from educational websites. Journal of Education Technology, 19 (3), Egyptian Society for Technology, 161-205, Education. : http://search.mand  umah.com/Record/80949

    26. Muhammad, H. H. (2017). The use of the Edmodo platform in developing self-organized learning skills and     the trend towards employing it in teaching social studies to students of the General Diploma in the Faculty of Education. The Journal of the Educational Association for Social Studies, 90, Ain Shams University, Faculty of Education, 99-139, retrieved from: http: //search.mand  umah.com/Record/834309

    27. Al-Halfawi, W. s. Al-Atifi, M. A.  Zaki, M. (2017). A proposed model for an art platform via the web and     measuring its effectiveness in developing creative thinking among student teachers in art education. The Fourth Arabic and     Second International Scientific Conference: Quality Education - Present Challenges and     Visions of the Future, Ain Shams University, Faculty of Specific Education, Volume 3, 597-634, retrieved from https://search.mand  umah.com/Record/868200

    2)   English References:

    Ahea, M. (2016). The Value and Effectiveness of Feedback in Improving Students' Learning and Professionalizing Teaching in Higher Education. Journal of Education and Practice7(16), 38-41, retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1105282.pdf

    Akbar, F. S. (2017). Corrective Feedback in Written Synchronous and Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication, Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, 17(2), 9-27, retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1176713.pdf.

    Ali, Z. (2015). A Case Study of Tertiary Students' Experiences Using Edmodo in Language Learning. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics retrieved from: http://journal.ump.edu.my/ijleal/article/view/462.

    Al-Kathiri, F. (2015). Beyond the Classroom Walls: Edmodo in Saudi Secondary School EFL Instruction, Attitudes and Challenges. English Language Teaching8(1), 189-204, retrieved from:   https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1075186.pdf.

    Andersen, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, Technologies and implications for education, Bristol: JISC Technology and Standards Watch, 1(1), 1-64, retrieved from:  http://21stcenturywalton.pbworks.com/f/What%20is%20Web%202.0.pdf.

    Bada, S. O. & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education5(6), 66-70, retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1c75/083a05630a663371136310a30060a2afe4b1.pdf

    Baleni, Z. G. (2015). Online formative assessment in higher education: Its pros and cons. Electronic Journal of e-Learning13(4), 228-236, retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1062122.pdf.

    Bandura, A. (2007). Much ado over a faulty conception of perceived self–efficacy grounded in faulty experimentation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology26(6), 641-658, retrieved from:  http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/Bandura2007JSCP.pdf.

    Benta, D.; Bologa, G. & Dzitac, I. (2014). E- Learning platforms in higher education. Case study, 2nd International Conference on Information Technology and Quantitative Management, ITQM, Procedia Computer Science,  (31), 1170- 1176, retrieved  from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187705091400550X

    Bender, T. (2012). Discussion-based online teaching to enhance student learning: Theory, practice and assessment. Stylus Publishing, LLC., 2nd ed, Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 40(1),1-3.

    Bitchener, J., Young, S.& Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing.  Journal of second language writing, 14(3), 191-205, retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1060374305000366

    Black, A. (2005). The use of asynchronous discussion: Creating a text of talk. Contemporary issues in Technology and teacher education5(1), 5-24, retrieved from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/5993/

    Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability Accountability (formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education), 21(1), 5-31, retrieved from: https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/9119063/Black2009_Developing_the_theory_of_formative_assessment.pdf

    Blees, I. & Rittberger, M.(2009). Web 2.0 learning environment: Concept, Implementation, Evaluation. PAU Education, European Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, eLearning papers, 15, retrieved from:  https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/33975871.pdf.

    Boyd, G. M. (2013). Conversation theory. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Routledge, 189-207,‏ retrieved from:  https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8209/bfd5343882a3796b2de8f44a310a56e47a30.pdf

    Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to give effective feedback to your students, second edition. ASCD, Alexandria, USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, retrieved from: http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/publications/books/How-to-Give-Effective-Feedback-to-Your-Students-2nd-Edition-sample-chapters.pdf.

    Capacho, J. (2017). Assessment of Student Learning in Virtual Spaces, Using Orders of Complexity in Levels of Thinking. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education18(2),179-201, retrieved  from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1145321.pdf.

    Chen, W. & Looi, C. K. (2007). Incorporating online discussion in face to face classroom learning: A new blended learning approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology23(3), 307-326, retrieved from: https://repository.nie.edu.sg/bitstream/10497/14280/1/AJET-23-3-307.pdf

    Chuang, W. C. (2009). The effects of four different types of corrective feedback on EFL students’ writing in Taiwan. Dayeh University Bulletin4, 123-128, retrieved from: http://www.finchpark.com/courses/tkt/Unit_32/07.pdf.

     

    Colace, F.; De Santo, M. & Vento, M. (2003). Evaluating on-line learning platforms: a case study. In 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the IEEE, retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.103.8445&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

    Dagger, D.; O'Connor, A.; Lawless, S.; Walsh, E. & Wade, V. P. (2007). Service-oriented e-learning platforms: From monolithic systems to flexible services. IEEE Internet Computing11(3), 28-35, retrieved from: http://www.tara.tcd.ie/bitstream/handle/2262/27023/service+orientated+e-learning+platforms.pdf?sequence=1

    DiCicco, K. M. (2016). The effects of Google Classroom on teaching social studies for students with learning disabilities, (Master’s Thesis), Department of Interdisciplinary and Inclusive Education, College of Education, Rowan University,  retrieved from: https://rdw.rowan.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2583&context=etd

    Dowling, S.(2011). Wed-based Learning: Moving from Learning Islands to Learning Environments. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language15(2), retrieved from:  http://tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej58/int.pdf.

     

    Downing, K. J.; Lam, T.; Kwong, T.; Downing, W. & Chan, S. (2007). Creating interaction in online learning: A case study, Journal Research in Learning Technology, Association for Learning Technology, 3 (15), 201–215, retrieved  from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/14125.pdf.

    Drexhage, J., Leiss, D., Schmidt, T., & Ehmke, T. (2016). The connected classroom: Using video conferencing technology to enhance teacher training. Reflecting Education10(1), 70-88, retrieved  from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/43d8/a9dad78ee4ef4c48e47f81ce9d6f827e5598.pdf

    Dudding, C. C. (2009). Digital videoconferencing: applications across the disciplines. Communication Disorders Quarterly30(3), 178-182, retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1525740108327449 ‏

    Enriquez, M. A. S. (2014).  Students’ Perceptions on the Effectiveness of the Use of Edmodo as a Supplementary Tool for Learning. De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines, In DLSU Research Congress, 1-6, retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/19779963/Students_Perceptions_on_the_Effectiveness_of_Using_Edmodo_in_EFL_Classes

    Gikandi, J.W., Morrow, D. & Davis, N.E. (2011). Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: A Review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333-2351, retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131511001333

    Gomes, B. & Gomes, R. (2011). Platforms to Support e-Learning in Higher Education Institutions. In 2nd International Conference on Education and Management Technology, 119-127, retrieved from: http://www.ipedr.com/vol13/24-T00040.pdf.

    Gómez Zermeño, M. G., & Franco Gutiérrez, H. (2018).The use of educational platforms as teaching resource in mathematics. JOTSE: Journal of technology and science education8(1), 63-71, retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1173800.pdf

    Graddy, D. (2002). Rhetorical Approach to Assessing Online DiscussionIn Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 173-174, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), retrieved from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/6711/

    Grant, M. M. & Mims, C.(2009). Web 2.0 in teacher education: Characteristics, implications and limitations. Wired for learning: An educators guide to Web2, 343-360, retrieved from: https://www.clifmims.com/documents/Web2.0-in-TchrEd.pdf

    Greenberg, A. D. (2009). Mapping the latest research into video-based distance education. Wainhouse Research White Paper, retrieved from: https://www.broadconnect.ca/resource-centre/white-papers/other-solutions-collaboration/navigating-research-on-videoconferencing-based-distance-education.pdf

    Harvey, Jasmin (2007). Effective decision making, The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, United Kingdom, London, retrieved from: http://www.cimaglobal.com/Documents/ImportedDocuments/40_Effective_Decision_Making.pdf.

    Hatziapostolou, T. & Paraskakis, I. (2010). Enhancing the impact of formative feedback on student learning through an online feedback system, Electronic Journal of e-Learning8(2), 111-122, retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ895699.pdf.

    Hellrung, K. & Hartig, J. (2013). Understanding and Using Feedback A review of empirical studies concerning feedback from external evaluations to teachers. Educational Research Review, 9, 174-190, retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X12000474.

    Hmelo-Silver; C. E.; Duncan, R. G. & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and. Educational psychologist42(2), 99-107, retrieved from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00461520701263368

    Horton, W. & Horton, K. (2003). E-learning Tools and Technologies: A consumer's guide for trainers, teachers, educators, and instructional designers. John Wiley & Sons Publishing, Indiana, ISBN: 0471444588, 591-607.

    Hsu, C. M. (2012). The Construction of a Web-Based Learning Platform from the Perspective of Computer Support for Collaborative Design.  (IJACSA)International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 3(4), 105-112, retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/55f9/c9b9cc4cb688716a5e7c69aff2097b0af91d.pdf

    Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google classroom: what works and how? Journal of Education and Social Sciences3(1), 12-18, retrieved from: http://jesoc.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/KC3_35.pdf

    Karran, T.; Latomaa, T.; Pohjonen, J.; Ruotsalainen, M. & Pulkkinen, J. (2004). On-line assessment for e-learning: options and opportunities, Centre for Educational Research and Development, University of Lincoln, Lincoln retrieved from: http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/1610/1/OuluAssessmentChapterforRepository.pdf

    Kartal, E. (2010). Feedback Processes in Multimedia Language Learning Software, French Language Teaching Department, Faculty of Education, Uludag University, Online Submission, 7(4), 53-65, retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509945.pdf.

    Kats, Y. (Ed.). (2010). Learning Management System Technologies and Software Solutions for Online Teaching: Tools and Applications: Tools and Applications. IGI Global, retrieved from: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1855320.

    Khaneghah, R. N. (2016). The Efficiency of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on Vocabulary Development of Iranian English Learners: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS)​1(1), 2524-2548, retrieved from: http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/article/view/2248

    Kumaran, V. S. (2015). Towards formative assessment of e-learners using concept map. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning5(2), retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d7df/fc21d8627d37fdbff4a27684cd14e7cf6fc3.pdf

    Lang , J.W. & Kersting, M.(2007). Regular Feedback from Student Ratings of Instruction: Do College Teachers Improve their Ratings in the Long Run? Instructional Science, 3 (35), 187–205, retrieved from: http://kersting-internet.de/pdf/Lang_Kersting_online_IS_2006.pdf

    Leach, N. (2015). Social Development theory: a case for multilingual tutorials (Mlts) in law. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning10(1), 51-68, retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/274f/48fe59d8b38e4cdc12eb157764afb70412bf.pdf

    Lei, S. A. (2008). Factors changing attitudes of graduate school students toward an introductory research methodology course. Education128(4), retrieved from:  https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ816957

    Love, K. M.; Bahner, A. D.; Jones, L. N. & Nilsson, J. E. (2007). An investigation of early research experience and research self-efficacy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice38(3), 314, retrieved from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-07614-015

    Luque, D.; López, F. J.; Marco-Pallares, J.; Càmara, E. & Rodríguez-Fornells, A. (2012). Feedback-related brain potential activity complies with basic assumptions of associative learning theory. Journal of cognitive neuroscience24(4), 794-808, retrieved from: http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/65362/1/619265.pdf.‏

    Lynch, R.; Seery, N. & Gordon, S. (2010). The formative value of peer feedback in project based assessment. In 3rd International Symposium for Engineering Education, University College Cork, Ireland, retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267551943_THE_FORMATIVE_VALUE_OF_PEER_FEEDBACK_IN_PROJECT_BASED_ASSESSMENT.

    MacKnight, C. B. (2000). Teaching critical thinking through online discussions. Educause Quarterly23(4), 38-41, retrieved from: http://eac595b.pbworks.com/f/macknight+2000+questions[1].pdf

    Marques, B. P.; Villate, J. E. & Vaz de Carvalho, C. (2015). A Proposal to Enhance the Use of Learning Platforms in Higher Education. International Association for Development of the Information Society, retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED562470.pdf

    Mohd Shaharanee, I. N.; Jamil, J.; Rodzi, M. & Syamimi, S. (2016). The application of Google Classroom as a tool for teaching and learning. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering8(10), 5-8, retrieved from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/78487287.pdf

    Morscheck, M. (2010). The School Library and E-Learning Platforms. International Association of School Librarianship the 39Th Annual Conference, retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518508.pdf.

    Mullikin, E. A.; Bakken, L. L. & Betz, N. E. (2007). Assessing research self-efficacy in physician-scientists: the clinical research appraisal inventory. Journal of Career Assessment15(3), 367-387, retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1069072707301232.

    Muslimah, A. (2018). A Survey on the Use of Google Classroom in English Language Education Department of Islamic University of Indonesia, Degree in English Language Education, Department of English Language Education, Faculty of Psychology and Socio-Cultural Sciences, Islamic University of Indonesia, retrieved from: https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/10932

    Narciss, S.; Sosnovsky, S.; Schnaubert, L.; Andrès, E.; Eichelmann, A.; Goguadze, G. & Melis, E. (2014). Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies. Computers & Education71, 56-76 retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131513002662

    Ng, W. K. & Kong, S. L. (2008). Training of distance education tutors at Wawasan Open University: One semester later. Quarterly Review of Distance Education9(1), 85-96, ISSN 1528-3518 retrieved from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/106676/

    Nicol, D. J. & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice, Studies in higher education31(2), 199-218, retrieved from: http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/rap/docs/nicol.dmd.pdf.

    Nikolova, M.(2012). Characteristics and Forms of the Electronic Assessment of the Knowledge, Scientific Work at the Russian University, 51(6.2), retrieved from: http://conf.uni-ruse.bg/bg/docs/cp12/6.2/6.2-15.pdf.

    Owen, L. (2016). The Impact of Feedback as Formative Assessment on Student Performance, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education28(2), 168-175, retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1111131.pdf.

    Pachler, N.; Daly, C.; Mor, Y. & Mellar, H. (2010). Formative e-assessment: Practitioner cases. Computers & Education54(3), 715-721, retrieved from: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/file/index/docid/592754/filename/CAE_Feasst09.pdf

    Palloff, R. M.& Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. John Wiley & Sons, retrieved from: https://www.amazon.com/Building-Online-Learning-Communities-Strategies/dp/0787988251

    Pangaro, P. (2017). Questions for conversation theory or conversation theory in one hour. Kybernetes46(9), 1578-1587, retrieved from: https://www.pangaro.com/published/Pangaro%E2%80%93Conversation_Theory_In_One_Hour-Kybernetes_2017.pdf

    Roselli, T.; Rossano, V. & Di Bitonto, P. (2015). Digitally enhanced assessment in virtual learning environments, Journal of Visual Languages & Computing31, 252-259, retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0f7c/9a1ee3c64321c8b67554af66021893ffeca7.pdf

    Peterson, C. (2004). Making interactivity count: Best practices in video conferencing. Journal of Interactive Learning Research15(1), 63-74, retrieved from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/12786/

    Piccoli, G.; Ahmad, R. & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS quarterly, 25(4), 401-426, retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3250989

    Race, P. (2014). The lecturer's toolkit: a practical guide to assessment, learning and teaching. Routledge, retrieved from: http://learningforte.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Lectures-in-the-Digital-Age.pdf

    Rop, K.V. & Bett, N. (2012). Video Conferencing and Its Appllcation in Distance Learning. Department of Telecommunication and Information Engineering, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Department of Technology, University of Eastern Africa, Baraton, retrieved from: https://www.scribd.com/document/132216022/IP-BASED-SECURITY-ON-VIDEO-CONFERENCING

    Scheeler, M. C.; McAfee, J. K.; Ruhl, K. L. & Lee, D. L. (2006). Effects of corrective feedback delivered via wireless technology on preservice teacher performance and student behavior. Teacher education and special education29(1), 12-25, retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/088840640602900103

    Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research. American Educational Research Association, 78(1), 153-189, retrieved from: http://projects.ict.usc.edu/dlxxi/materials/Sept2009/Research%20Readings/Shute%202008%20Focus%20on%20formative%20feedback.pdf

    Skinner, E. (2009). Using community development theory to improve student engagement in online discussion: a case study. ALT-J17(2), 89-100, retrieved from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09687760902951599

    Sorensen, P. (2008). Feedback and Assessment. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 85-105, retrieved from: http://mjde.usm.my/vol10_2_2008.html.

    Suhendi, A. (2018). Constructivist Learning Theory: The Contribution to Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. KnE Social Sciences, 87-95, retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324950046_Constructivist_Learning_Theory_The_Contribution_to_Foreign_Language_Learning_and_Teaching

    Tayebi, V.; Tavakoli Ghoochani, H. & Armat, M. (2011). Student and teachers' point of view on feedback and related factors in clinical education at North Khorasan University of medical sciences. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences3(1), 69-74.

    Thien, P. C.; Le Van Phan, N. K. L.; Tho, Q. T.; Suhonen, J. & Sutinen, E. (2013). Applying Edmodo to serve an online distance learning system for undergraduate students in Nong Lam University, Vietnam, In Proceedings of the IETEC’13 Conference, retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260563663_Applying_Edmodo_to_serve_an_online_distance_learning_system_for_undergraduate_students_in_Nong_Lam_University_Vietnam

    Vaccaro, N. (2009). The relationship between research self-efficacy, perceptions of the research training environment and interest in research in counselor education doctoral students: Ex-post-facto, cross-sectional correlational investigation, University of Central Florida, http://etd.fcla.edu/CF/CFE0002511/Vaccaro_Nicole_200905_PhD.pdf

    Vandewaetere, M.; Desmet, P. & Clarebout, G. (2011). The contribution of learner characteristics in the development of computer-based adaptive learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior27(1), 118-130 retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563210002347

    Van Dinther, M.; Dochy, F. & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational research review6(2), 95-108, retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X1000045X.

    Weingardt, K.R. (2004). The Role of Instructional Design and Technology in the Dissemination of Empirically Supported.Mannual Based Therapies, Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 313-331, retrieved from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1093/clipsy.bph087.

    Wijesooriya, C.; Heales, J. & Clutterbuck, P. (2015). Forms of formative assessment in virtual learning environmentsIn Twenty-first Americas Conference on Information Systems, retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d7df/fc21d8627d37fdbff4a27684cd14e7cf6fc3.pdf

    Williams, D.; Ma, Y.; Pedersen, S.& Prejean,L. (2009). Design of a Web-based System to Support Assessment in Virtual Environments for Learning (VEL), University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Texas A&M University Retrieved from:  https://members.aect.org/pdf/Proceedings/proceedings09/2009/09_60.pdf

    Woolley, H.; Bayliss, S.; Peters, M. & Thompson, T. (2015). What are the Features of Effective Feedback? Oxford Spires Academy Feedback Research Group, http://www.oxfordspiresacademy.org/download/documents/Feedback-project-presentation-for-research-champion-mtg-nov-2015.pdf

    Working Paper on E-Learning Platforms (2017), 61st Meeting, 24-25 April, Washington D.C. (USA), International Working Group on Data Protectionin Tele communications, retrieved from: https://epic.org/IWG/workingpapers/e-learning-platforms.pdf

    Yuste, R.; Alonso, L. & Blázquez, F. (2012). Synchronous Virtual Environments for e-Assessment in Higher Education, Scientific Journal of Media Education, ISSN: 1134-3478, 159-167, retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264890934_Synchronous_Virtual_Environments_for_e-Assessment_in_Higher_Education