Al-Asar, S. A. A. (2021). A proposed strategy based on integrating self-regulated learning strategies and web-based inquiry communities and its impact on cognitive and social presence, academic achievement, and handling academic stress among graduate students at the College of Education. Educational Technology, 31(9), 113–240.
Abu Al-Dahab, M., & Younis, S. (2015). The interaction between types of e-learning supports and their presentation modes and its impact on developing multimedia design and production skills among information science students. Journal of Education at Al-Azhar University, 165(4), 332–420.
Ahmed, H. I. M. (2018). Developing educational e-content based on the integration of metacognitive scaffolding styles (structural - problematic) for implementing collaborative learning activities in the Moodle system and its impact on developing e-course design competencies and socially regulated learning skills. Educational Technology, 28(3), 3–106.
Ahmed, S. M. (2009). The effectiveness of utilizing scaffolding in computer-based educational programs in developing electronic writing skills for English language student-teachers. Paper presented at the 12th Scientific Conference: E-Learning Technology: Between Challenges of the Present and Future Prospects, Egyptian Association for Educational Technology, Egypt, 37–66.
Al-Batae, H. (2015). Performance support patterns and their impact on developing e-assessment skills among faculty members at Taif University using the Blackboard learning management system and their attitudes toward it. Journal of Educational Sciences, (4), 231–350.
Khalifa, G., Khamis, M., & Abdel-Hamid, M. (2018). The effect of using levels of support (concise - detailed) in ubiquitous e-learning on developing problem-solving skills among educational technology students. Scientific Journal of the Faculty of Specific Education, 5(31), 231–260.
Khalil, H. H. A., & Hidaya, R. H. (2018). Designing a model of smart aids in a personal learning environment based on cognitive styles to develop cognitive achievement, self-regulation, and motivation for achievement among education college students. Journal of the Faculty of Education at Assiut University, 34(11), 645–708.
Khamis, M. (2009). Educational computers and multimedia technology (2nd ed.). Dar Al-Sahab.
Rabie, A. (2022). Individual and collaborative activities in micro e-learning via mobile web and two modes of educational support and their interaction’s effect on developing achievement, cognitive load, and perceptions of support among student-teachers.
Egyptian Association for Educational Technology, 32(1), 3–177.
https://doi.org/10.21608/tesr.2022.215001
Zeitoun, K. (2008). Designing educational programs with constructivist thinking: A theoretical foundation and empirical research. Alam Al-Kutub.
Saraya, A. (2008). Educational technology and learning resources (2nd ed.). Al-Rushd Library.
Al-Salami, Z. H. H. (2016). Two educational support patterns using augmented reality in a blended learning environment and their effect on developing achievement, programming skills, and learning engagement among students of specific education colleges with high and low achievement motivation. Egyptian Association for Educational Technology, 26(1), 3–114.
Sweidan, A. A., Abdelhamid, A. S., & Shimi, N. S. (2017). Criteria for designing e-content based on constructivist learning scaffolds. Educational Sciences, 25(1), 38–87.
El-Sayed, M. (2014). The impact of web-based interaction between constructivist educational scaffolds and learning styles (surface vs. deep) on achievement and decision-making in selecting learning resources among education college students. Journal of the Faculty of Education at Port Said University, 6, 129–180.
Saif, A. (2018). The effectiveness of the Edmodo platform-based environment utilizing educational scaffolds in developing learning engagement and e-communication skills among educational technology students. [Unpublished master’s thesis], Fayoum University, Faculty of Education.
Al-Shaya, H. M. (2016). Interaction of Princess Nourah University students with e-learning environments: An experimental study. Arab Center for Education and Development, 23(101), 191–292.
Shokr, A. S. (2020). The effect of interaction between the presentation style and level of e-support within constructivist electronic activities on developing educational software production skills among educational technology students. Studies in University Education, 46, 179–198.
Al-Dabba, M. (2014). The effectiveness of e-project strategies in developing electronic interaction, collaboration, and attitudes toward them among education college students at the Islamic University in Gaza. [Unpublished master’s thesis], Islamic University of Gaza.
Al-Taran, E. (2012). The impact of different performance support system design patterns (internal - incidental - external) based on the web on achievement and skill acquisition among education college students. Paper presented at the 13th Scientific Conference: E-Learning Technology: Contemporary Trends and Issues, Egyptian Association for Educational Technology, Egypt, 2–31.
Azmi, N. G., & Al-Mardani, M. M. (2010). The impact of interaction between different types of constructivist learning scaffolds within the e-book on achievement and learning efficiency among graduate education students. Educational and Social Studies – Helwan University, 16(3), 251–321.
Afifi, M. K. (2010). Learning scaffolds as an approach to designing and developing e-courses and their effectiveness on student performance in project-based learning and satisfaction with e-learning. Arab Society for Educational Technology, 63–107.
Ghoneim, E. (2018). E-support patterns in mobile learning environments and their effect on developing database programming skills among educational technology students. Arab Society for Educational Technology, (36), 142–204.
El-Feel, H. (2018). Modern educational variables in the Arab environment. Anglo Library.
Mazen, H. (2012). Educational technology and its electronic applications. Al-Sahab Publishing.
Madkour, A., & Al-Azab, H. (2020). The interaction between “fixed/flexible” support modes in hypermedia environments and motivation levels on developing animation production skills and learning engagement among educational technology students. Journal of the Faculty of Education in Educational Sciences at Ain Shams University, 44(3), 333–502.
المراجع الأجنبية:
Alias, N. (2012). Design a motivational scaffold for the Malaysian e-learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 137-151.
Amro, F. A. (2019). Scaffolding Students’ Problem-Solving Skills in a Computer- Based Adaptive Learning Program: An Analysis of Scaffolding Types and Strategies [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation], George Mason University.
An, Y., & Cao, L. (2014). Examining the Effects of Metacognitive Scaffolding on Students' Design Problem Solving and Metacognitive Skills in an Online Environment. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10 (4), 552-568.
Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Thomas, L., Seibert, D., &Tron, M. (2003). Online process scaffolding and students’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Illinois.
Bao, H., Li, Y., Su, Y., Xing, S., Chen, N., & Rosé, C. (2021). The effects of a learning analytics dashboard on teachers’ diagnosis and intervention in computer-supported collaborative learning.
Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(2), 287-303. DOI:
10.1080/1475939X.2021.1902383
Belland B.R. (2014). Scaffolding: Definition, Current Debates, and Future Directions. In: J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen & M. Bishop (Eds.),
Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, Springer.
https://doi-org.sdl,idm.oclc.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_39
Belland, B. R., Walker, A., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education: A meta-analysis.
Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309–344.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999
Belland, B., Kim, C., & Hannafin, M. (2013). A framework for designing scaffolds that improve motivation and cognition. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 243–270.
Cagiltay, K. (2006). Scaffolding strategies in electronic performance support systems: Types and challenges. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 93-103. DOI: 10.1080/14703290500467673
Dixson, M. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4), n4.
Doo, M., Bonk, C., & Heo, H. (2020). A Meta-Analysis of Scaffolding Effects in Online Learning in Higher Education.
International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 60–80.
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4638
Finch, D., & Jacobs, K. (2012). Online Education: Best Practices to Promote Learning. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 546–550.
Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory (pp. 115-140). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jackson, S. L., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). The design of guided learner-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments. In C. M. Karat, A. Lund, J. Coutaz & J. Karat (Eds.). Paper presented at the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 187–194.
Kim, J., & Lim, K. (2019). Promoting learning in online, ill-structured problem solving: The effects of scaffolding type and metacognition level. Computers & Education, 138, 116-129.
Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2018). Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. Internet and Higher Education, 37, 52-65.
McNeill, K., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Synergy Between Teacher Practices and Curricular Scaffolds to Support Students in Using Domain-Specific and Domain-General Knowledge in Writing Arguments to Explain Phenomena. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(3), 416-460.
Molenaar, I., & Roda, C. (2011). Attention management for dynamic and adaptive scaffolding. In I. Dror (Ed.), Technology Enhanced Learning and Cognition. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Purarjomandlangrudi, A. and Chen, D. (2019) A causal loop approach to uncover interrelationship of student online interaction and engagement and their contributing factors.
Research in Learning Technology,
27.
https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2058
Salmon, G. (2011).
E-Moderating: The Key to Online Teaching and Learning (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/97802038
16684
Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(3), 77–96.
Tawfik, A., Law, V., Ge, X., Xing, W., & Kim, K. (2018). The effect of sustained vs. faded scaffolding on students’ argumentation in ill-structured problem solving.
Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 436-449.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.035
Valencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2018). Effect of Motivational Scaffolding on E-Learning Environments: Self-Efficacy, Learning Achievement, and Cognitive Style.
Journal of educators online, 15(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1168
944
Valencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2019). Effect of a metacognitive scaffolding on self-efficacy, metacognition, and achievement in e-learning environments. Knowledge Management & ELearning, 11(1), 1–19.
Yilmaz, F. G. K., & Yilmaz, R. (2019). Impact of pedagogic agent-mediated metacognitive support towards increasing task and group awareness in CSCL.
Computers & Education, 134, 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.001
: مجلة علمية محکمة للبحوث التربوية والنفسية والاجتماعية', './data/jsrep/coversheet/cover_en.jpg'))
مشاهدة على SCiNiTO