تصورات طلاب الجامعة نحو استخدام المعلم الجامعى تكنولوجيا المعلومات والاتصالات لدعم الابتكار فى عملية التعلم

نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية

المؤلف

قسم علم النفس التعليمى كلية التربية – جامعة الازهر.

المستخلص

هدف البحث الى التعرف على  تصورات طلاب الجامعة  نحو  استخدام المعلم  تكنولوجيا المعلومات والاتصالات   الداعمة  للابتكار فى عملية التعلم   في  عالم اكاديمى متغير، و  ما اذا  كان هناك فروق فى  تصورات الطلاب   نحو  استخدام المعلمين  التكنولوجيا  الداعمة  للابتكار فى عملية التعلم    فى ضوء التخصصات الدراسية  المختارة ( علمى – ادبى – نوعى ) لاهمية  ذلك  في تنمية  الطلاب معرفيا ومهاريا ووجدانيا  كما اشار الى ذلك العديد من الباحثين على اهمية  ستخدام تكنولوجيا المعلومات والاتصالات فى دعم  التعليم الابتكارى   فى ضوء ادارة عملية التدريس ، والعمل على تقدم الطلاب الاكايمى ،  واستمتاع المعلمين بتكنولوجيا المعلومات و جودة نظام التعليم . تكونت عينة البحث من (384) طالباً من كلية التربية جامعة الأزهر، وتمثلت اداة البحث فى مقياس  تصورات الطلاب نحو استخدام المعلم الجامعى استخدام   تكنولوجيا المعلومات والاتصالات  فى دعم الابتكار.   اشارت النتائج الى :
    -  ان  تصورات الطلاب نحو استخدام  المعلم الجامعى تكنولوجيا المعلومات والاتصالات فى  دعم الابتكار فى التعلم  كانت مرتفعه  فى ضوء استجابات    افراد  العينة على المقيا س.
  -  أن المتوسط الحسابي لكل بعد من  ابعاد المقياس  تراوحت بين (2,508: 2,609) . فقد جاء البعد الثاني في المرتبة الأولي ،  يليه البعد الخامس في المرتبة الثانية ، يليه البعد الرابع في المرتبة الثالثة، يليه البعد الأول في المرتبة الرابعة،  ثم البعد الثالث في المرتبة الخامسة ،  وقد بلغ متوسط  العينة على المقياس ككل (2,552) والذي يقع في نطاق الاستجابة المرتفعة
   -  وجدت  فروق  دالة إحصائيا  لدى افراد العينة على ابعاد المقياس  والدرجة الكلية تعزى  للتخصص الدراسى (علمي ،  أدبي ،  نوعي)  وهذه الفروق لصالح التخصص العلمى. باستثناء بعد جودة النظام التعليمي.

الكلمات الرئيسية


Avidov-Ungar, O. (2010). "Islands of innovation" or "Comprehensive innovation". Assimilating educa- tional technology in teaching, learning, and management: A case study of school networks in Israel. In- terdisciplinary ”  , Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 6 : 259-280
Al Lily, A. (2013) .  " Social change and educational technologies: By invitation or invasion”.  Journal of OrganisationalTransformation&Social Change, 10 ,(1):  42-63
Al-Hezam, D. M. (2017). “  The impact of digital technology on children’s transition from kindergarten to primary school: Bringing concepts from international research and practice to Saudi Arabia. Waikato” .  Journal of Education, 22(2), 47–52.
Armitage A., Pihl O., Ryberg T.  (   2015) . “  PBL and Creative Processes”. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education,  3 , (1) , (2015):  Special  Issue:  PBL  and  Creative  Processes,  I–IV
Bykov V.Yu.   (  2008)  .  Distance  learning. In:  Kremen  V.G.  (Ed.) Encyclopedia of  Education of Ukraine.  Yurinkom Inter, Kyiv, , 191–193. (in Ukrainian)
Budnyk O.    (  2014)  .   "  Professional Training of Primary School Teachers to Social and Educational Activities: Theory and Practice. “Seredniak T.K.”, Dnipropetrovsk,. (in Ukrainian)
Badia A, Meneses J and Sigalés C (2013)  " Teachers’ perceptions of factors affecting the educational use of ICT in technology-rich classrooms. Electronic ”  .Journal of Research in Educational Psychology , 11 ,(3) : 787–808
Buckley-Marudas, M. F. (2016). ‘Truth,’ interrupted: Leveraging digital media for culturally sustaining education. Multicultural Learning and Teaching, 12(2)
Blankenship, M. (2011). How social media can and should impact higher education. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed For Quick Review, 76 ,(7): 39-42
Cunningham, C. A. (2009).   Transforming schooling through technology: Twenty-first-century approaches to participatory learning. Education and Culture, 25 ,(2), 46-61
Collinson, V. (2010).  To learn or not to learn: A potential organizational learning gap among school sys- tems? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9, (2): 190 – 219
Clancy, M., & Gardner, J. (2017). “ Using digital portfolios to develop non-traditional domains in special education settings”. International  Journal of EPortfolio, 7(1) : 93–100
Coffman, T. (2009).   Getting to the heart of technology integration: Virginia's instructional technology re- source teacher program. Learning and Learning with Technology, 36 ,(7): 20-23
Ciampa, K. (2017). Building bridges between technology and content literacy in special education: Lessons learned from special educators’ use of integrated technology and perceived benefits for students. Literacy Research and Instruction, 56(2), 85–113
Chang, J. H., Chiu, P. S., & Huang, Y. M. (2018). “  A sharing mind map-oriented approach to enhance collaborative mobile learning with digital archiving systems”  . International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(1) : 1–24
Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009) . " Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development”. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41 ,(3) : 319-346
Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2007).  Variations in the conditions for teachers' professional learning and development: Sustaining commitment and effectiveness over a career. Oxford Review of Education, 33 ,(4): 423-443
Diaz, V. (2011). “  Cloud-Based technologies: Faculty development, support, and implementation. ”  Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15 ,(1): 95-102
Eshet, Y. (2004).  “ Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era.  Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13 ,(1) :  93-106.
Erdogan T (2011) . “ Factors that influence pre-service teachers’ ICT usage in education. European   ”.Journal of Teacher Education 34(4): 483–499.
Fletcher, L. S. (2011). Creative thinking in schools: Finding the "just right" challenge for students. Gifted Child Today, 34(2), 37-42
Fokides, E., & Kefallinou, M. (2020). “   Examining the impact of spherical videos in teaching endangered species/environmental education to primary school students”. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19 : 427–450
Fransson, G., Holmberg, J., & Westelius, C. (2020). The challenges of using head mounted virtual reality in K-12 schools from a teacher perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3383–3404
Farella, E. (2010). The influence of teacher characteristics, beliefs, and program quality on childrens creativity. (Thesis, Master of Science). The University of Alabama
Gabriel, M. A., Campbell, B., Wiebe, S., MacDonald, R., & McAuley, A. (2012).   “ The role of digital technologies in learning: Expectations of first year university students. Canadian . ”  Journal of Learning & Technology; 38(1): 1-18
Graham C.R.    ( 2005 )     Blended  learning  system:  Definition,  current  trends and future  direction.  In:  Bonk  C.J., Graham  C.R.  (Eds.)  Handbook  of  Blended  Learning:  Global  Perspectives,  Local  Designs.  Pfeiffer,  San Francisco, 3–21
Green, K. C. (2010). Campus Computing 2010: The 21st National Survey of Computing and Information Technology in American Higher Education. Encino, CA: Campus Computing Project. Retrieved from
Heindl, M., & Nader, M. (2018).   “ Digital technologies in a design and technology lesson and their influence on a learner’s situationally perceived value of a task when engaged in inquiry-based learning”.  Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 37(3): 239-263
Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). “  Teacher's technological pedagogical content knowledge: Cur- riculum-based technology integration reframed ”.  Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4): 393-416
Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019). “  Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher–AI complementarity ”.  Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 27–52
Haynes, C. A., & Shelton, K. (2018).  “  Beyond the classroom: A framework for growing school capacity in a digital age”.  Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(4), 271–281
Halverson, R., & Smith, A. (2009). “   How new technologies have (and have not) changed teaching and learn- ing in schools. ”  Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2):  49-55
Hamza, M., & Griffith, K. (2006). Foster problem solving & creative thinking in the classroom: cultivating a creative mind. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal-Electronic. 19 (3), 1-30
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2008). National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETS*T)
Kusano K, Frederiksen S, Jones L, Kobayashi M, Mukoyama Y, Yamagishi T, Sadaki K and Ishizuka H(2013) “   The effects of ICT environment on teachers’ attitudes and technology integration in Japan and the US. ”  Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice 12(1): 29–43
Kotsari, C., & Smyrnaiou, Z. (2017). “   Inquiry based learning and meaning generation through modelling on geometrical optics in a constructionist environment. European”   .Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 14–27
Kubiatko M (2013) The comparison of different age groups on the attitudes toward and the use of ICT. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 13(2): 1263–1272
Lorenz R, Eickelmann B and Gerick J (2015) What affects students’ computer and information literacy around the world? – An analysis of school and teacher factors in high performing countries. Paper presented at the SITE Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 6–10 March 2015. Las Vegas: Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference
Lichtman, G. (2013(, Sept/Oct). Take aim at innovation. Learning and Leading with Technology, 41(2), 12-17
Lei, L., Finley, J., Pitts, J., & Rong, G. (2010).  “ Which is a better choice for student-faculty interaction: synchronous or asynchronous communication? ”   Journal of Technology Research, 21-12
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054
Moyer, L., Klopfer, M., & Ernst, J. V. (2018). Bridging the arts and computer science: Engaging at-risk students through the integration of music. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 77(6), 8–12
Misfeldt, M., & Zacho, L. (2016). Supporting primary-level mathematics teachers’ collaboration in designing and using technology-based scenarios. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2–3), 227–241
Morrell, M. A. (2015). The Development of Creativity in Adolescents: A Qualitative Study of How and Where Creativity Develops (Master dissertation, Colorado State University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global
Niemi, H., Niu, S., Vivitsou, M., & Li, B. (2018). “ Digital storytelling for twenty-first-century competencies with math literacy and student engagement in China and Finland”.  Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(4): 331–353
New Media Consortium (2013). The Future of Education. The 2013 NMC Horizon Project Summit Communiqué. January 22-24, 2013
Oye ND, Lahad NA and Rahim N (2014) The history of UTAUT model and its impact on ICT acceptance and usage by academicians. Education and Information Technologies 19(1): 251–270
Oakley, G., Pegrum, M., Xiong, X. B., Lim, C. P., & Yan, H. (2018). An online Chinese- Australian language and cultural exchange through digital storytelling. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 31(2), 128–149
Olha Boiko, Svitlana Oborska, Kateryna Kyrylenko, Svitlana Cherevko, Olha Lebid, Viktoriia Kulko ( 2021 )  International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, VOL.21 No.4, April 2021
Petko D (2012) Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the ‘will, skill, tool’ model and integrating teachers constructivist orientations. Computers & Education 58(4): 1351–1359
Reilly, R. C., Lilly, F., Bramwell, G., & Kronish, N. (2011). A synthesis of research concerning Creative teachers in a Canadian context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), 533– 542
Roy, J. (2013). Elementary Teacher Perceptions of Teaching Practices that Foster Creative Thinking in Students. Inquiry: The University of Arkansas Undergraduate Research Journal, 14(1)
Rubenstein, L. D. V., McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2013). Teaching for creativity scales: An instrument to examine teachers’ perceptions of factors that allow for the teaching of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(3), 324–334
Selwyn, N. (2010). “   Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology ”  . Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1) : 65–73
Taylor, D. B., Handler, L. K., FitzPatrick, E., & Whittingham, C. E. (2020). “ The device in the room: Technology’s role in third grade literacy instruction”. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(4), 515–533
United States Department of Education (USDE, 2013). Recognizing educational success, professional excellence, and collaborative teaching (RESPECT), 1-29
Way, J., Lilley, E., Ruster, C., Johnco, S., Mauric, L., & Ochs, L. (2009). Symposium: Interactive white- boards and pedagogy in primary classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Australian Association for Research in Education. Canberra, Australia. Retrieved December 1, 2010
Weldy, T. G., & Gillis, W. E. (2010). “  The learning organization: variations at different organizational lev- els”. The Learning Organization, 17(5), 455 – 470
Zhao, J., & Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (2009). School innovative management model and strategies: The per- spective of organizational learning. Information Systems Management, 26(3) 241-251