Abu El-Magd, M. A. M. (2017). Developing English language teaching researchers’ oral argumentative skills through webinar. Faculty of Education Journal, Port-said University, 320-368.
Aktas, I., & Bilgin, I. (2015). The effect of 4MAT learning model on the achievement and motivation of 7th grade students on the subject of particulate nature of matter and an examination of student opinions on the model. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(1), 1-21.
Al-Saleem, B. I. A. (2019). The 4MAT model in English language teaching. Arab World English Journal, 10(4),112 -120.
Álvarez, T. (2001). Textosexpositivo-explicativos y argumentativos [Argumentative and expository-explanatory texts]. ES: Octaedro.
Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-160.
Bawaneh, A. K. A., Md Zain, A. N., & Saleh, S. (2011). The effect of Herrmann Whole Brain Teaching Method on students’ understanding of simple electric circuits. European Journal of Physics Education, 2(2), 1-23.
Benchachinda, T. (2012). Developing English writing ability of grade 6 students using the 4MAT system. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(6), 551.
Berge, K. L., Evensen, L. S., & Thygesen, R. (2016). The wheel of writing: a model of the writing domain for the teaching and assessing of writing as a key competency. The Curriculum Journal, 27(2), 172-189.
Chinn, C. A. (2006). Learning to argue. In O'Donnell, A. M., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., &Erkens, G. (Eds.). Collaborative learning, reasoning, and technology, (pp.224-239). Routledge.
Cotton, F., & Wilson, K. (2011). An investigation of examiner rating of coherence and cohesion in the IELTS academic writing task 2. In J. Osborne (Ed.), IELTS research reports (Vol. 12, pp. 235e310). Melbourne: IELTS Australia and British Council.
Dastjerdi, H. V., & Samian, S. H. (2011). Quality of Iranian EFL learners’ argumentative essays: cohesive devices in focus. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 65-76.
De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 139.
Elnaggar, B. E. (2018). Developing a program-based on scientific discourse analysis to enhance engineering students’ scientific argumentative writing skills. Journal of Faculty of Education, Banha University, 29(116), 1-22.
Erhard, K., Kessler, F., Neumann, N., Ortheil, H. J., & Lotze, M. (2014). Professional training in creative writing is associated with enhanced fronto-striatal activity in a literary text continuation task. NeuroImage, 100, 15-23.
Golpour, F. (2014). Critical thinking and EFL learners' performance on different writing modes. Journal of Pan-pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 103-119.
Hasani, A. (2016). Enhancing argumentative writing skill through contextual teaching and learning. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(16), 1573-1578.
Hassan, S. R. (2018). EFL develop to model learning flipped the using school secondary STEM of skills writing argumentative students. Faculty of Education Journal, Tanta University. 74 - 2.
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley (content analysis).
Inel, Y. (2018). The effect of using the 4MAT teaching method in 6th-grade social studies education on the academic achievement of students. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 8(3), 440-458.
Jackson, P. R. (2001). The effects of teaching methods and 4MAT learning styles on community college students’ achievement, attitudes and retention in introductory microbiology, Doctoral Dissertation. The Lynn University, USA.
Kaur, S. (2015). Teaching strategies used by Thai EFL lecturers to teach argumentative writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 208, 143-156.
Makkar, k. k. (2017). IELTS academic essays from the past exams. Chandigarh Publishing House.
McCarthy, B. (1980). The 4mat system: teaching to learning styles with left/right mode techniques. Arlington Heights.
McCarthy, B. (1990). Using 4MAT system to bring learning styles to schools. Educational Leadership, 48(2), 31-37.
McCarthy, B. (2000). About teaching 4MAT in the classroom. About Learning Incorporation.
McCarthy, B., & McCarthy, D. (2003). About teaching companion: the 4MAT implementation workbook. About Learning Incorporation.
McCarthy, B., & McCarthy, D. (2006). Teaching around the 4MAT cycle: designing instruction for diverse learners with diverse learning styles. Corwin Press.
McCarthy, B., White, C., & McNamara, M. C. (1987). 4MAT system: teaching to learning styles with right/left mode techniques. Barrington.
Mitchell, S., & Riddle, M. (2000). Improving the quality of argument in higher education: Final report. School of Lifelong Learning and Education, Middlesex University.
Moghaddam, S. (2015). An investigation of IELTS preparation courses for university study: development of written and verbal argumentative texts. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 2(4), 755-757.
Musa, H. I. A. I. (2018). Dialogic vs. formalist teaching in developing argumentative writing discourse and reducing speaking apprehension among EFL Majors. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(5), 895-905.
Neff-van Aertselaer, J., & Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). Argumentation patterns in different languages: An analysis of meta-discourse markers in English and Spanish texts. Developing Contrastive Pragmatics Interlanguage and Cross-cultural Perspectives, 87-102.
Nicoll-Senft, J. M., & Seider, S. N. (2009). Assessing the impact of the 4MAT teaching model across multiple disciplines in higher education. College Teaching, 58(1), 19-27.
Nikolaou, A., & Koutsouba, M. (2012). Incorporating 4MAT model in distance instructional material–An innovative design. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 15(1). 1-10.
Nippold, M., & Ward-Lonergan, J. (2010). Argumentative writing in preadolescents: The role of verbal reasoning. Child Language Teaching and Therapy,23(3), 238–248.
Nowacki, A. S. (2011). Using 4MAT framework to design a problem-based learning biostatistics course. Journal of Statistics Education, 19(3).
Ruangtrakun, T., &Chaiyasang, S. (2019). Using 4MAT teaching model to enhance students’ achievement and to maintain retention in mathematics. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University (Humanities, Social Sciences and arts), 12(6), 1248-1261.
Salahu-Din, D., Persky, H., & Miller, J. (2008). The nation’s report card: Writing 2007 (NCES 2008-468). National Center for Educational Statistics.
Sampson, V., & Gleim, L. (2009). Argument-driven inquiry to promote the understanding of important concepts & practices in biology. The American Biology Teacher, 71(8), 465-472.
Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y., Gil, J., & Ilya, M. (2003). Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentation activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2). 219-256.
Scriven, M. (1976). Reasoning. McGraw-Hill.
St Germain, C. (2002). Historical perspective: Major theories modeled in 4MAT system for teaching learning and leadership. About Learning.
Tatar, E., & Dikici, R. (2009). The effect of 4MAT method (learning styles and brain hemispheres) of instruction on achievement in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(8), 1027-1036.
Tezcan, G., &Güvenç, H. (2017). The effects of 4MAT teaching model and whole brain model on academic achievement in science. EgitimveBilim, 42(192).
Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument.Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning. Macmillan.
Walton, D. N. (1998). The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. University of Toronto Press.
Walton, D. N. (2007). Dialog theory for critical argumentation. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Wu, S. M. (2006). Creating a contrastive rhetorical stance: Investigating the strategy of problematization in students’ argumentation. RELC Journal, 37(3), 329–353.
Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 79-101.
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.
: مجلة علمية محکمة للبحوث التربوية والنفسية والاجتماعية)', './data/jsrep/coversheet/cover_ar.jpg'))
مشاهدة على SCiNiTO