L Majors Perceptions of their Oral Performance Development in an English Language and Translation Programme

نوع المستند : بحوث فی مجال المناهج وطرق التدریس

المؤلفون

Al-Azhar University, College of Education, Cairo

المستخلص

Abstract:
The current study sought to explore the perceptions of EFL majors' oral performance development in an English Language and Translation Programme (henceforth EL & T Programme). Participants of the study comprised 35 Level One students studying the Listening & Speaking 1 Course. Quantitative and qualitative data were obtained through administering a questionnaire, running interviews and conducting classroom observation schemes. The findings of the study indicated that although students perceived the value of using the target language during their classroom interaction, they did not spontaneously interact using it. Furthermore, the presence of the teacher in the classroom, for them, was compelling. More importantly, fear of making mistakes was perceived as a factor that inhibited students’ engagement in classroom interactions. The study concluded with a number of conclusions, pedagogical implication and recommendations for further research.

الكلمات الرئيسية

الموضوعات الرئيسية


References

Astuti, D. K. (2013). The Gap between English competence & performance (Performance: The learners` speaking ability). Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on foreign language teaching and learning. Language Institute, Thamasat University, Indonesia; pp. 660-671.
Brown, J.D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cotter, Ch. (2007). Speaking well - Four steps to improve your ESL EFL students speaking ability. Retrieved from http://ezinearticles.com/?Speaking-Well----Four-Steps-To-Improve-YourESLEFL- Students-Speaking-Ability&id=631232
de Bot, K.,Lowie, W.&Verspoor, M. (2005). An introduction to second language acquisition: Dynamic aspects.London: Rutledge.
Dornyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration and processing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dörnyei Z. (2010). Researching complex dynamic systems: Focus on L2 motivation. Paper presented to the American Association for Applied Linguistics Annual Conference 2010. Atlanta, GA, 8 March.
Ellis,  N. (2007). Dynamic systems and SLA: The wood and the trees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1),23-5.
Forero, Y. (2005). Promoting oral interaction in large groups through task-based learning. Profile Issues in Teachers` Professional Development,1(6), 73-82.
Geert, P. (2008). The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 179-99.
Harumi, S. (2011). Classroom silence: Voices from Japanese EFL learners. ELT J,65(3), 260-269.
 
 
Hashemi, M., &KhaliliSabet, M. (2013). The Iranian EFL students’ and teachers’ perception of using Persian in general English classes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature,2(2),142-152.
Ibrahim, H. (2013). Power and empowerment in the EFL writing classroom. Research Journal of English Language and Literature, 1(3), 260-274.
Ismail, A. A. (2011). Exploring students’ perceptions of ESL writing. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 73-83.
Jianing, X. (2007). Storytelling in the EFL Speaking Classroom. The Internet TESL Journal,6(13), 1 – 8.
Karfa, A. (2007). Open classroom communication and the learning of citizenship values. English TeachingForum, 54(4), 16-22.
Kemmis, S.&McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory Action research .In N. K. Dezin& Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.567-605). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Kung, S. & Chuo, T. (2002). Students’ perceptions of English learning through EFL/ESL websites. TESL EJ Journal, 6(1). Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org/ej21/toc.html
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141-65.
Larsen-Freeman, D. &Cameron, L. (2008).  Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. London, Oxford University Press.
Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 3, 387-417.
MacIntyre, P.D., & Gardner, R.C. (1991).  Investigating language class anxiety using the focused essay technique. The Modern Language Journal, 75(3), 296-304.
Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
 
 
 
Mita, K., Shirao, M., Martin, S., Hatagaki, Y. &Dendo, G. (2006). The impact of foreign Asian students in Japanese University EFL classrooms. The Asian EFL Journal QuarterlyThe EFL Professional’s Written Forum, (8), 155 – 168. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/March06_kmmssmyhgd.pdf
Norton, L. S. (2009). Action research in teaching and learning (A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities).Newyork, USA: Routledge.
Park, H., &Lee, A.R. (2005). L2 Learners’ anxiety, self-confidence and oral performance. Proceedings of the 10th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics (pp. 107-208). Edinburgh University.
Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (1998). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
Sanchez-Hernandez, M., Gallardo-Vazquez , D.& Martinez-Azua, B.  (2014). "Students’ perceptions among foreign languages in the EHEA", Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 6(2), 205 – 214.
Tse, L. (2000). Student perceptions of foreign language study: A qualitative analysis of foreign language autobiographies. The Modern Language Journal, 84(i), 69-84.
Venditi, P. &Bahruth, R. (1987). A resource manual for introducing ESL students to aspects of American culture. Retrieved from the ERIC database. (ED 291 427).
Yamashiro, A. D., & Johnson, J. (1997). Public speaking in EFL: Elements for course design. The Language Teacher, 21(4),13-17.
Young, D.J. (1991).  Creating a low-anxiety classroom environment:  What does language anxiety research suggest?The Modern Language Journal, 75(4),426-439.